Planning appeal decision
Oaklands North, High Street, Cuckfield, RH17 5EL
the erection of a two-storey side extension
- Authority
- Mid Sussex
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- RH17 5EL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the Cuckfield Conservation Area
What decided it
The extension would fail to reflect the special characteristics of the conservation area and cause less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset, which could not be outweighed by the limited economic benefits of the building works.
Less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area and the significance of the designated heritage asset was weighed against limited public benefits from local economic activity during building works; the harm outweighed the benefits.
Framework references: 215
Plan policies cited: Policy DP35, Policy DP26, Neighbourhood Plan Policy CNP1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®