Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 July 20266009334

Oaklands North, High Street, Cuckfield, RH17 5EL

the erection of a two-storey side extension

Authority
Mid Sussex
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
RH17 5EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the Cuckfield Conservation Area

What decided it

The extension would fail to reflect the special characteristics of the conservation area and cause less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset, which could not be outweighed by the limited economic benefits of the building works.

Less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area and the significance of the designated heritage asset was weighed against limited public benefits from local economic activity during building works; the harm outweighed the benefits.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: Policy DP35, Policy DP26, Neighbourhood Plan Policy CNP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.