Planning appeal decision
Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
Planning appeal 6009503 at Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 8 September 2026 by Inspector K Dryden, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belsize Park Conservation Area.
Demolition of existing building and erection of part single, part two-storey detached dwelling and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- K Dryden
- Postcode
- NW3 4UL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belsize Park Conservation Area
What decided it
The moderate harm to the significance of the Belsize Park Conservation Area arising from the size, scale, siting and design of the proposed development, which would not be outweighed by the public benefits advanced, including self-build provision and housing delivery contributions.
The moderate harm to the significance of the conservation area, to which substantial weight must be given under Framework Policy HE6, substantially outweighed the benefits of self-build provision, housing delivery, climate change mitigation, biodiversity enhancements, affordable housing contributions and car-free development measures.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H4Policy T1Policy T2Policy A1Policy T4Policy DM1Policy D2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 September 20266008940Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
- Allowed15 July 2026600599712 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
- Notice upheld22 June 20263370592Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
- Notice upheld22 June 20263370591Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR
- Allowed18 June 20263377057Former Mansfield Bowling Club, Croftdown Road, London, Camden
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®