Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20266010140

Amberwood Cottage, St Catherines Hill Lane, Christchurch, BH23 2NL

Planning appeal 6010140 at Amberwood Cottage, St Catherines Hill Lane, Christchurch, BH23 2NL (Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 28 July 2026 by Inspector L J Evans, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies; and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

to demolish existing conservatory and erect a single storey side extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
L J Evans
Postcode
BH23 2NL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies; and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal represents a disproportionate addition to the original building in relation to NPPF paragraph 154(c), and the other considerations put forward do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt such that very special circumstances exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy KS3Policy H14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 145Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

88 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266009627
    Parley Court Farm, Parley Court Estate, Parley Green Lane, Christchurch, BH23 6BB
  2. Dismissed21 July 20266005306
    Le Beau, Arrowsmith Road, Poole, BH21 3BE
  3. Notice upheld27 March 20263337488
    The Boathouse, 9 Quay Road, Christchurch, BH23 1BU
  4. Dismissed4 November 20253364875
    Land off Christchurch Road, West Parley, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH23 6BB
  5. Allowed9 June 20253343045
    Southcoast Karting, Chapel Gate Circuit Chapel Gate, Parley, Christchurch, BH23 6BL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.