Kishla, Stonny Croft, Ashtead, KT21 1SQ

Planning appeal 6010214 at Kishla, Stonny Croft, Ashtead, KT21 1SQ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 6 August 2026 by Inspector J Davis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area.

Proposed two-storey side extension, ground floor rear extension and first floor rear extension, including conversion of existing garage into habitable room, with replacement pitched roof to front projection

Authority: Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder
Procedure: Written
Development: residential
Inspector: J Davis
Postcode: KT21 1SQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed extensions would lack subservience to the host dwelling and visually overwhelm its scale and proportions, causing substantial harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area that cannot be outweighed by other considerations.

the benefits of improved living accommodation and investment in the property did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy EN4 of the Mole Valley Local Plan (2020-2039) (2024)Policy AS-H5 of the Ashtead Neighbourhood Development Plan (2017)Policy AS En-3 of the Ashtead Neighbourhood Development Plan (2017)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

104 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Allowed27 October 20266010634
The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
Dismissed27 October 20266003694
1 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
Dismissed20 October 20266013764
Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
Dismissed19 October 20266011465
Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
Dismissed16 October 20266010203
High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.