Planning appeal decision
1-5 South View Barns, Brickhouse Lane, Newchapel, RH7 6HY
Planning appeal 6010313 at 1-5 South View Barns, Brickhouse Lane, Newchapel, RH7 6HY (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 4 September 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies.
Conversion of agricultural building to form five dwellings with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- A Wright
- Postcode
- RH7 6HY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed scheme on the setting of the nearby Branford Wells grade II listed building
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to the provision of amenity space
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to meet the sustainability criterion in Policy GB7(1)(g) of the Framework as the rural location would make future occupiers heavily reliant on private vehicles, and the cumulative harm to the Green Belt, listed building setting, character and appearance, and living conditions cannot be outweighed by the modest benefits offered.
The modest benefits of housing delivery and social and economic benefits, together with limited weight to the fallback position, do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the moderate harm to the significance of the listed building, the harm to character and appearance, and the unacceptable living conditions for future occupants.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP20Policy DP7Policy CSP18Policy CSP21
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®