Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 September 20266010568

7 Caledonia Road, Stanwell, Staines-upon-Thames, TW19 7TD

Planning appeal 6010568 at 7 Caledonia Road, Stanwell, Staines-upon-Thames, TW19 7TD (Spelthorne Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 September 2026 by Inspector G Ellis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions for the occupiers.

Change of use from Class C4 House in Multiple Occupation (up to 6 residents) to Sui Generis House in Multiple Occupation for 8 residents

Authority
Spelthorne Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
G Ellis
Postcode
TW19 7TD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions for the occupiers
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the proposed bin and cycle storage
  • The effect of the development on parking

What decided it

The deficient communal space combined with the visual impact of bin and cycle storage and inadequate cycle provision to support sustainable transport collectively failed to provide an acceptable living environment and high-quality design contrary to the development plan.

The Framework's aim to make efficient use of land and buildings was outweighed by the failure to maintain acceptable living standards for residents and achieve high-quality design; no material considerations outweighed the conflict with the development plan taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PS2Policy P2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

83 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Spelthorne Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed25 September 20266007620
    Eden Grove, 17-51 London Road, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 4EX
  2. Allowed25 September 20266007619
    Eden Grove, 17-51 London Road, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 4EX
  3. Dismissed4 August 20266006583
    35 Oakfield Road, Ashford, TW15 1DN
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005974
    7 Marlborough Road, Ashford, TW15 3PZ
  5. Allowed18 June 20266004573
    25 Edward Way, Surrey, Ashford, TW15 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.