Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 October 20266012051

Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Southampton, SO32 2AR

Planning appeal 6012051 at Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Southampton, SO32 2AR (Winchester) was dismissed on 15 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development, having regard to the local development strategy.

a change of use from agriculture to mixed use for agricultural and residential use at Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Durley, SO32 2AR. Summary

Authority
Winchester
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SO32 2AR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development, having regard to the local development strategy
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

the conflict of the proposed mixed use with the spatial strategy and its resulting unacceptable harm to the rural character of the area, which substantially outweighed the limited benefits

the adverse impacts of the developments would substantially outweigh the limited private benefits identified

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy H3Policy D1Policy NE9Policy NE14
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy S5Policy DP3
Judgments
Murfitt v SSE [1980] JPL 598; Somak Travel v SSE [1987] JPL 630; Kestrel Hydro v SSCLG & Spelthorne BC [2016] EWCA Civ 784; Caldwell & Timberstore Ltd v SSLUHC & Buckinghamshire Council [2024] EWCA Civ 467

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Winchester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed10 August 20266005547
    Land at Lower Paddock, Bent Lane, Hambledon, PO7 4QP
  2. Notice upheld26 March 20263327152
    2 Calpe Yard St. Thomas Street, Winchester, SO23 9HE
  3. Notice upheld19 January 20263331896
    Shedfield Equestrian Centre, Botley Road, Shedfield, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2HN
  4. Notice upheld19 January 20263328886
    Shedfield Equestrian Centre, Botley Road, Shedfield, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2HN
  5. Notice upheld19 January 20263328885
    Shedfield Equestrian Centre , Botley Road, Shedfield, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.