Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 October 20266012104

Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE

Planning appeal 6012104 at Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE (Dorset) was dismissed on 22 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the building formed part of an established agricultural unit for the purposes of Class Q(a)(i), and whether the proposal is excluded from permitted development by the limitation in Class Q.1(a).

to convert agricultural outbuilding to dwellinghouse

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
BH16 6FE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the building formed part of an established agricultural unit for the purposes of Class Q(a)(i), and whether the proposal is excluded from permitted development by the limitation in Class Q.1(a)
  • Whether it has been demonstrated that the existing building would be capable of complying with the nationally described space standard, having regard to Class Q.1(o)
  • Whether the proposal would be acceptable in respect of flooding risks on the site, having regard to Class Q2(1)(d)
  • Whether the location or siting of the building, in relation to the protected trees, makes its change to residential use impractical or undesirable under Class Q2(1)(e)

What decided it

The existing building's floor plan does not demonstrate capability to comply with the nationally described space standard bedroom requirements, excluding the proposal from permitted development under Class Q.1(o).

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010776
    The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266014673
    52 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
  3. Dismissed22 October 20266011513
    Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
  4. Allowed21 October 20266010895
    Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU
  5. Dismissed20 October 20266010515
    Abbots Litten, Long Street, Sherborne, DT9 3BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.