Planning appeal decision
Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX
Planning appeal 6013576 at Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX (Rotherham) was dismissed on 15 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of existing and future residents.
- Authority
- Rotherham
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- S65 2DX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of existing and future residents
What decided it
The extension would block the only window serving the front bedroom, causing notably worse reduction in natural light and fresh air access, thereby causing harm to the living conditions of existing and future residents.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rotherham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266011173Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
- Dismissed22 October 2026601264456 Knollbeck Lane, Brampton Bierlow, Rotherham, S73 0TP
- Allowed13 October 20266008695Land at Harley Road, Harley, Rotherham, S62 7UD
- Dismissed7 September 2026601103923A Rowms Lane, Swinton, S64 8AA
- Notice varied and upheld5 August 20263375108Land at the Rear of 19 Shelley Road, Herringthorpe, Rotherham, S65 2NF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®