Planning appeal decision
Land at Peel Hall, Warrington, Cheshire, WA2 9TY
Planning appeal 3178530 at Land at Peel Hall, Warrington, Cheshire, WA2 9TY (Warrington Borough Council) was allowed on 10 August 2021 by Inspector Downes T, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the safety and efficiency of the local and strategic highway network and character of the area to the south of the site.
a new residential neighbourhood including C2 and C3 uses; local employment (B1 use); local centre including food store up to 2000m2, A1-A5 (inclusive) and D1 use class units of up to 600m2 total (with no single unit of more than 200 m2) and family restaurant/ pub of up to 800m2 (A3/ A4 use); site for primary school; open space including sports pitches with ancillary facilities; means of access and supporting infrastructure
- Authority
- Warrington Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Downes T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the safety and efficiency of the local and strategic highway network and character of the area to the south of the site
- The effect of the proposed development on the noise environment both within the site and in the surrounding area
- The effect of the proposed development on local air quality
- The contribution the site would make to the housing land supply in the short to medium term
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply (3.4 years) engaged the tilted balance, and the substantial benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the highway and character harm, which fell short of a 'severe' residual cumulative impact.
Very substantial weight to market and affordable housing delivery, and significant weight to economic, sporting and open space benefits, outweighed the very significant weight attributed to harm to highway efficiency and character, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy MP7Policy QE6Policy QE7Policy QE4Policy QE5Policy CS2Policy SN1Policy SN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 48Paragraph 111Paragraph 186Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- (1) Gallagher Homes Limited (2) Lioncourt Homes Limited v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council [2014] EWHC 1283 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warrington Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed26 October 20266008814Land at Fowl Farm, Off Mowcroft Lane,, Cuerdley, Warrington, WA5 2XQ
- Dismissed5 June 20266003754McDonald's, Unit 3 Fortress Boulevard, Warrington, WA5 3ZT
- Dismissed23 April 202660021268 Bruche Heath Gardens, Padgate, Warrington, WA1 3TP
- Dismissed2 March 20263376044217 Knutsford Road, Grappenhall and Thelwall, Warrington, WA4 2TX
- Dismissed25 February 2026337621511 Hickory Close, Woolston, Warrington, Cheshire, England, WA1 4EQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®