Planning appeal decision
Former Westferry Printworks Site, 235 Westferry Road, London , E14 3QS
Planning appeal 3225474 at Former Westferry Printworks Site, 235 Westferry Road, London , E14 3QS (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) was dismissed on 25 June 2021 by Inspector Prentis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
a comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment comprising 1,524 residential units (Class C3), shops, offices, flexible workspaces, financial and professional services, restaurants and cafes, drinking establishments (Classes B1/A1/A2/A3/A4), community uses (Class D1), car and cycle basement parking, associated landscaping, new public realm and all other necessary enabling works. Summary of Recommendation: That the appeal be dismissed
- Authority
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Prentis D
- Postcode
- E14 3QS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- Effect on strategic views and the settings of the Maritime Greenwich WHS and Tower Bridge
- Effect on the recreational use of Millwall Outer Dock
- Housing Delivery Test and housing land supply
- The mix of market and affordable housing in terms of numbers, size and tenure
- Provision of public open space
- Public benefits of the scheme
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the settings of the Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site, the Old Royal Naval College and Tower Bridge was not outweighed by the scheme's public benefits, providing a clear reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(i).
Moderate weight to the delivery of housing (including affordable housing) and to construction-phase economic benefits, limited weight to the housing land supply shortfall, and very little weight to the CIL payment were outweighed by considerable weight given to heritage harm to the WHS, Old Royal Naval College and Tower Bridge, significant weight to harm to character and appearance, further significant weight to conflict with Framework paragraph 134, and limited weight to harm to sailing conditions, such that the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D3Policy D9Policy HC4Policy HC1Policy HC2Policy SI 16Policy SI 17Policy H5Policy H10Policy S.DH1Policy S.DH3Policy S.DH5Policy S.H1Policy S.OWS2Policy D.DH6Policy D.H2Policy D.OWS4Site allocation 4.12NP Policy D1NP Policy D2NP Policy ES1NP Policy SD1NP Policy 3D1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 59Paragraph 118Paragraph 123Paragraph 127Paragraph 134Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- R. v. London Borough of Tower Hamlets, ex parte Barrett [2000] WL 281291
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld30 September 20263368399232 Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BJ
- Notice varied and upheld30 September 2026336172248A White Horse Road, London, E1 0ND
- Dismissed30 September 202660110097 Douro Street, London, E3 2TS
- Dismissed29 September 20266010662Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA
- Dismissed29 September 20266010661Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®