Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted23 June 20213231743

Sawmills, Green Lane , Outwood, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5QP

Planning appeal 3231743 at Sawmills, Green Lane , Outwood, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5QP (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 23 June 2021 by Inspector Walker A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal developments are inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

change of use of land and buildings to Class B1, B2 and B8 use, retention of sawmill use, retention of existing bunding (under power lines), retention of Ryall & Edwards sales building on current site and retention of welfare buildings on existing site, widening of access road

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Walker A
Postcode
RH1 5QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal developments are inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
  • The effect of the appeal developments on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
  • The effect of the appeal developments on the character and appearance of the site and area.
  • The effect of the appeal developments on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, as regards noise and disturbance.
  • The sustainability of the location and effect of the appeal developments on highway safety and capacity.
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations? If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the appeal developments?

What decided it

The Ryall & Edwards sales building and welfare portacabins lay outside the agreed Previously Developed Land area, causing Green Belt and character harm that was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced.

Substantial Green Belt harm plus significant harm to character and appearance from the sales building and welfare portacabins, outside the PDL, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to employment and economic benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist for that part of Appeal B; the remaining elements of both appeals, being neutral in Green Belt terms within the PDL, were found acceptable and permitted.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DP7DP10DP13DP22CSP18CSP21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 144Paragraph 145Paragraph 146

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

28 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  5. Allowed25 September 20266006497
    Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.