Planning appeal decision
Land on the North West Side of Cockerham Road, Bay Horse, Lancaster, LA2 0HQ
Planning appeal 3241296 at Land on the North West Side of Cockerham Road, Bay Horse, Lancaster, LA2 0HQ (Wyre Borough Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 14 June 2021 by Inspector Lloyd I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the enforcement notice contains all elements of the lawful mixed use, given planning permission for stabling of horses.
without planning permission the material change of use of the Land from agricultural use to a mixed use for part agricultural and part use for the siting of a static caravan for residential purposes
- Authority
- Wyre Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Lloyd I
- Postcode
- LA2 0HQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the enforcement notice contains all elements of the lawful mixed use, given planning permission for stabling of horses
- Whether the notice adequately describes what the appellant has done wrong and what must be done to remedy it
- Whether the caravan has been adapted to become a building
- Whether the building operations are immune from enforcement action under section 171B(1) (four-year immunity for building operations)
- Whether there has been a change of use to a dwellinghouse immune from enforcement action under section 171B(2) (four-year immunity for change of use to single dwellinghouse)
- Whether the enforcement notice was properly served on all occupiers
What decided it
The enforcement notice alleged a material change of use of land to residential use (caravan), but the Inspector found the structure was a building immune from enforcement action under section 171B(1), and there was insufficient evidence of a change of use to a dwellinghouse under section 171B(2), making the notice incapable of correction without injustice.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1963] 2 WLR 225; Measor v SSETR & Tunbridge Wells DC [1999] JPL 182; Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982] 47 P&CR 142; [1983] JPL 307; Swale BC v FSS & Lee [2005] EWCA Civ 1568; [2006] JPL 886; Thurrock BC v SSETR & Holding [2002] EWCA Civ 226; [2002] JPL 1278
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wyre
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld13 February 20263372425Mayfield House, New Lane, Eagland Hill, Pilling, Lancashire, PR3 6BA
- Notice upheld25 April 20253344872Pad End Barn Pinfold Lane, Inskip, Preston, PR4 0UA
- Notice varied and upheld22 October 20243316124Land on the North Side of Crook Gate Lane, Out Rawcliffe, Preston, Lancashire, PR3 6TR
- Notice varied and upheld3 April 20243322003Helmsdeep Long Lane, Barnacre, Preston, PR3 1RN
- Notice upheld21 February 20243296817The Crossing Cottage Lambs Lane, Pilling, Preston, PR3 6SB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®