Planning appeal decision
Land at Passford Farm Southampton Road, Boldre, Lymington, SO41 8ND
Planning appeal 3246928 at Land at Passford Farm Southampton Road, Boldre, Lymington, SO41 8ND (New Forest) was dismissed on 28 March 2022 by Inspector Hand S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there is a ground (b) appeal, i.e. whether a material change of use occurred.
the use of the Lodge as a single dwellinghouse
- Authority
- New Forest
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Hand S
- Postcode
- SO41 8ND
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether there is a ground (b) appeal, i.e. whether a material change of use occurred
- Whether the Lodge succeeds on ground (d) - continuous use as an independent dwelling for more than 4 years
- Whether the Barn succeeds on ground (d) - continuous use as an independent dwelling for more than 4 years
- Whether the fencing around the Barn is permitted development (ground (c)) and, if not, whether planning permission should be granted (ground (a))
- Whether the outbuilding is permitted development (ground (c)) and, if not, whether planning permission should be granted (ground (a))
- Whether there was deliberate concealment sufficient to displace the statutory time limits
What decided it
The finding that the Lodge and Barn had each been in continuous use as independent dwellings for more than four years, without deliberate concealment sufficient to displace the statutory time limit, which established immunity from enforcement under ground (d).
For the Barn's means of enclosure, the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed farmhouse was outweighed by the fact that an equivalent fallback boundary treatment outside the listed curtilage would cause similar harm, so nothing was to be gained in planning or heritage terms from refusing permission, and it was granted; for the outbuilding, the identified harms to design, openness and setting were not outweighed by any countervailing benefit, so permission was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP2DP18SP17SP16
- Judgments
- Moore v SSCLG and anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1202; Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWCA Civ 26
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice upheld11 May 20263345956153 Woodlands Road, Ashurst, Southampton, Hampshire, SO40 7BH
- Notice upheld11 May 20263342251Duck Hill Farm, Newbridge , Cadnam, New Forest , SO40 2NW
- Notice varied and upheld29 April 20263375133Land West of Lynwood, Rossiters Lane, Woodlands, Hants, SO40 7HX
- Notice varied and upheld14 April 20263374397Kensington Lodge, Main Road, Dibden, Southampton, SO45 5TD
- Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263328653Northerwood Avenue, , Lyndhurst, SO43 7DU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®