Planning appeal decision
Land on the East Side of Watling Street, (More Commonly Known As Land at Jockey Farm), Caddington, Dunstable, LU6 3QP
Planning appeal 3248824 at Land on the East Side of Watling Street, (More Commonly Known As Land at Jockey Farm), Caddington, Dunstable, LU6 3QP (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 24 March 2022 by Inspector Dyer S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
change of use of land on an existing Gypsy site, for residential and touring caravans, with hardstanding, parking and related infrastructural development. Appeal
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dyer S
- Postcode
- LU6 3QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and landscape character
- Whether the development provides satisfactory living conditions for future residents with particular reference to the site layout and facilities
- The effect of the development on surface water flooding
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development, on either a permanent or temporary basis
What decided it
The cumulative weight of the considerations in favour of the appellant did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, combined with harm to the AONB/landscape character and intentional unauthorised development, so very special circumstances were not established.
Substantial harm to Green Belt openness, moderate harm to the AONB/landscape character, and moderate weight against intentional unauthorised development were not clearly outweighed by the substantial weight given to the lack of alternative accommodation and the significant weight given to the personal circumstances of the occupiers including the best interests of children, so the balance tipped against granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy EE5Policy EE7Policy H7Policy HQ1Policy CC5Policy SP8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 148
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336326410 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®