Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 June 20213251948

Canterbury Student Manor, Shillings Yard, Canterbury, CT1 1GA

Planning appeal 3251948 at Canterbury Student Manor, Shillings Yard, Canterbury, CT1 1GA (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 24 June 2021 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the proposal on the integrity of the Habitats Sites.

the erection of five blocks of student accommodation (297 beds) comprising 60 cluster flats and 65 studio apartments with communal facilities, parking and cycle storage without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref CA/15/01938/VAR, dated 15 January 2016

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Philpott M
Postcode
CT1 1GA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal on the integrity of the Habitats Sites
  • whether the proposal represents a sustainable form of development with regard to the site's location, vehicle movements and parking provision

What decided it

The proposal would increase nutrient loading into the Stour catchment and adversely affect the integrity of the Habitats Sites, contrary to the Habitats Regulations and the development plan, and this harm could not be outweighed by other material considerations.

The benefits of sustainable transport design, site accessibility, and efficient use of the site were outweighed by the adverse effects on the integrity of the Habitats Sites through increased nutrient loading from wastewater.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DBE1Policy T1Policy SP1Policy T17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 177

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

68 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed26 March 20263374468
    The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
  2. Allowed5 March 20263374628
    Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT
  3. Allowed26 February 20263373183
    Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
  4. Dismissed22 May 20253358230
    143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
  5. Dismissed21 May 20253359117
    13 Gordon Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5QX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.