Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 August 20213252138

Land at 214, Harrow View, Harrow, HA2 6PL

Planning appeal 3252138 at Land at 214, Harrow View, Harrow, HA2 6PL (London Borough of Harrow) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 August 2021 by Inspector Rogers B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the flat in question provides suitable living conditions for its present and future occupants.

without planning permission, the change of use of the single storey rear extension to shop from ancillary retail (Class A1) to a self contained flat (Class C3)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rogers B
Postcode
HA2 6PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the flat in question provides suitable living conditions for its present and future occupants

What decided it

The flat provides unduly cramped living conditions with inadequate daylighting, poor outlook, and exposure to noise and disturbance, contrary to development plan requirements for acceptable living conditions.

Whilst the provision of an additional dwelling is desirable in principle, this does not override the need for such provision to be made in a way that achieves acceptable living conditions for residents in accordance with local and national policy; the development fails to do this.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London PlanHarrow Core StrategyHarrow Development Management Policies Local PlanTechnical Housing StandardsMayor's Housing Supplementary GuidanceSupplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

475 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266011608
    6 Mead Close, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5JN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  4. Allowed27 August 20266009442
    36 St Kildas Road, Harrow, HA1 1QA
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263355600
    Masons Arms, 75 High Street, Edgware, HA8 7DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.