Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 March 20233253383

Station Business Park, Main Road, Stickney, BOSTON, PE22 8EE

a workshop/storage building, associated hard standing and vehicular access

Authority
East Lindsey District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Madge M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue is whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a Certificate of LDC is well-founded.

What decided it

The finding that the field was so intimately associated with the existing industrial building, through ownership, physical layout and functional (drainage/access) connection, that it formed part and parcel of the building's curtilage.

Judgments cited: Sinclair-Lockhart's Trustees v Central Land Board [1950] 1 P&CR 195; Methuan-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; Attorney General, ex r Sutcliffe v Calderdale Borough Council (1983) 46 P&CR 399; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR [2001] QB 59; Sumpton v London Borough of Greenwich [2007] EWHC 2776 (Admin); Hampshire CC & the Open Spaces Society & Others v SSEFRA & Blackbushe Airport Ltd [2020] EWHC 959 (Admin), [2021] EWCA 398, [2020] JPL 1359; Herbert Hiley v SSLUHC & East Lindsey District Council [2022] EWHC 1289 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.