Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 July 20223254057

1 Melita Nursery Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, Chichester, PO20 7LW

Planning appeal 3254057 at 1 Melita Nursery Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, Chichester, PO20 7LW (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 28 July 2022 by Inspector Hockenhull H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site provides a suitable location for a Gypsy traveller site having regard to its location in relation to services and facilities and the perception of dominance of the local area.

Appeal A: material change of use of land to rear of dwelling for siting of residential caravans for a 7-pitch Gypsy Traveller site with associated development; Appeal B: change of use to a mixed use for siting of residential caravans for a 3-pitch Gypsy Traveller site with associated development (hard standing, fencing and utility buildings)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Hockenhull H
Postcode
PO20 7LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site provides a suitable location for a Gypsy traveller site having regard to its location in relation to services and facilities and the perception of dominance of the local area
  • whether other material considerations, including the general need for and supply of gypsy sites, the accommodation needs and personal circumstances of the appellants outweigh any harm such as to justify the development
  • the effect of the proposal on the character of the area with particular regard to tranquillity (Appeal A)
  • whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for drainage and minimises the risk of flooding (Appeal A)
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal B)
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity (Appeal B)

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that both proposals complied with the relevant development plan policies (LP Policy 36 and others) and caused no significant harm, reinforced by the significant unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches in the District.

the significant unmet need for and lack of a 5-year supply of Gypsy and Traveller pitches carried great weight in favour of both proposals, only slightly offset by limited weight against the intentional unauthorised (part-retrospective) development, and as both schemes were found to comply with the development plan as a whole, permission was granted for each.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2Policy 36Policy 42Policy 45Policy 48Policy 49Policy 50Policy 51
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 105

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263371769
    Melita Nursery, Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, PO20 7LW
  2. Dismissed6 July 20266003763
    Unit 1 The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
  3. Dismissed6 July 20266003762
    The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
  4. Dismissed6 July 20266003760
    Land South of Unit 1, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
  5. Dismissed6 July 20266003759
    The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.