Planning appeal decision
1 Melita Nursery Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, Chichester, PO20 7LW
Planning appeal 3254057 at 1 Melita Nursery Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, Chichester, PO20 7LW (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 28 July 2022 by Inspector Hockenhull H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site provides a suitable location for a Gypsy traveller site having regard to its location in relation to services and facilities and the perception of dominance of the local area.
Appeal A: material change of use of land to rear of dwelling for siting of residential caravans for a 7-pitch Gypsy Traveller site with associated development; Appeal B: change of use to a mixed use for siting of residential caravans for a 3-pitch Gypsy Traveller site with associated development (hard standing, fencing and utility buildings)
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- PO20 7LW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site provides a suitable location for a Gypsy traveller site having regard to its location in relation to services and facilities and the perception of dominance of the local area
- whether other material considerations, including the general need for and supply of gypsy sites, the accommodation needs and personal circumstances of the appellants outweigh any harm such as to justify the development
- the effect of the proposal on the character of the area with particular regard to tranquillity (Appeal A)
- whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for drainage and minimises the risk of flooding (Appeal A)
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal B)
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity (Appeal B)
What decided it
The Inspector's finding that both proposals complied with the relevant development plan policies (LP Policy 36 and others) and caused no significant harm, reinforced by the significant unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches in the District.
the significant unmet need for and lack of a 5-year supply of Gypsy and Traveller pitches carried great weight in favour of both proposals, only slightly offset by limited weight against the intentional unauthorised (part-retrospective) development, and as both schemes were found to comply with the development plan as a whole, permission was granted for each.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2Policy 36Policy 42Policy 45Policy 48Policy 49Policy 50Policy 51
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 105
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed5 August 20263371769Melita Nursery, Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, PO20 7LW
- Dismissed6 July 20266003763Unit 1 The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003762The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003760Land South of Unit 1, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003759The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®