Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20213255737

Agricultural Land West of 'Homefields', Low Lane, Terrington St Clement, Norfolk, PE34 4NW

Planning appeal 3255737 at Agricultural Land West of 'Homefields', Low Lane, Terrington St Clement, Norfolk, PE34 4NW (King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2021 by Inspector Brownless E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for development having regard to the development plan and national policy.

the construction of traditional brick and tile barn

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Brownless E
Postcode
PE34 4NW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for development having regard to the development plan and national policy
  • The effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of heritage assets

What decided it

The proposal lacked justification in agricultural or forestry terms and would cause less than substantial harm to the setting and significance of designated heritage assets with no public benefits to outweigh that harm.

The less than substantial harm to the setting and significance of the listed buildings was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the appellant's desire to provide secure storage attracted only limited weight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM2Policy CS06Policy CS08Policy DM15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 193Paragraph 194Paragraph 196

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed21 May 20266004964
    1 Smugglers Close, Old Hunstanton, PE36 6JU
  2. Dismissed20 May 20266005064
    Two Hoots, Church Street, Thornham, Norfolk, PE36 6NJ
  3. Dismissed15 May 20266004077
    5 Oxborough Drive, South Wootton, Kings Lynn, Norfolk, PE30 3HZ
  4. Dismissed11 May 20266003618
    Land Se East View, 98 High Street, Little London Road, Northwold, Norfolk, IP26 5NF
  5. Allowed7 May 20263376192
    Pentney Bowls and Leisure Club, Narborough Road, Kings Lynn, PE32 1JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.