Planning appeal decision
Units 1 & 2, Hampton Court Trading Estate, Summer Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0RG
Planning appeal 3257401 at Units 1 & 2, Hampton Court Trading Estate, Summer Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0RG (Elmbridge Borough Council) was allowed on 28 September 2021 by Inspector Jackson R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of existing buildings and erection of part three, part four storey buildings to create 78 residential units and ground floor unit for Class B1, with associated car and cycle parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jackson R
- Postcode
- KT7 0RG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide an appropriate standard of external amenity space for the proposed occupiers
- whether the proposed development would be satisfactorily integrated into the local community
- the effect on the setting of Hampton Court Palace
- the effect on highway safety
- whether there are any other benefits of the proposal, including the housing land supply position, that would lead to a determination other than in accordance with the terms of the development plan
What decided it
The lack of a five-year housing supply of housing land, which engaged the tilted balance in paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, combined with the proposal's compliance with the development plan taken as a whole and the significant housing benefits, decisively favoured granting permission.
The limited harm to the character and appearance of the area from the southern elevation of Block A was substantially outweighed by the significant benefits of delivering 78 new residential units on previously developed land with a housing mix weighted towards smaller properties, the provision of B1 floorspace, and the clear deficiency in five-year housing land supply, applying the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS17Policy CS21Policy CS25Policy DM2Policy DM7Policy DM10Policy DM12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 133Paragraph 187Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Allowed29 May 202660058508-14 Oatlands Drive, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9JL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®