Planning appeal decision
Land at Hillborough, Sweechbridge Road, Herne Bay, Kent, CT6 6TE
Planning appeal 3260611 at Land at Hillborough, Sweechbridge Road, Herne Bay, Kent, CT6 6TE (Canterbury City Council) was allowed on 21 June 2021 by Inspector Clegg R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide a sufficient amount and quality of open space.
Full planning permission for 193 dwellings and associated development including highway works, and outline planning permission (all matters reserved except access) for up to 707 dwellings, up to 31,500sqm employment/commercial floorspace, an 80 bed care home, local shopping facilities, a community centre, land for a primary school, and associated development
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Clegg R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would provide a sufficient amount and quality of open space.
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the density of the proposed housing.
- Whether the proposal would provide an appropriate amount of affordable housing, having regard to viability considerations.
- Whether the proposed development would include appropriate sustainable infrastructure.
- The effect of the proposed development on the movement of traffic on the local highway network and within the Hillborough strategic site.
- The effect of the proposed development on sites of nature conservation importance.
- Whether the proposed development would be consistent with the Development Plan.
What decided it
The proposal's overall accordance with the development plan, particularly its delivery of the strategic Policy SP3 allocation and the critical Herne Relief Road funding under Policy T13, outweighed the limited harms identified.
Significant weight to housing delivery and the Herne Relief Road/highway contribution, together with moderate weight to economic benefits and limited weight to affordable housing, outweighed the limited weight harms from loss of open land/best and most versatile agricultural land and the limited traffic harm from the Sweechbridge Road shuttle signal option, tipping the balance in favour of granting permission in accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy HD2Policy T1Policy T13Policy CC2Policy CC3Policy CC11Policy DBE3Policy OS11Policy LB5Policy SP6Policy QL5Policy QL11Policy EMP12Policy DM7Policy QL8Policy T9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 62Paragraph 64Paragraph 91Paragraph 92Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 110Paragraph 122Paragraph 124
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed26 March 20263374468The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
- Allowed5 March 20263374628Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT
- Allowed26 February 20263373183Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
- Notice varied and upheld13 August 20253362152Land at Romany Green Acre, Well Lane, Fordwich, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 0DU
- Dismissed22 May 20253358230143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®