Planning appeal decision
Land North of Sandy Lane, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9UN
Planning appeal 3261401 at Land North of Sandy Lane, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9UN (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 19 August 2021 by Inspector Parker R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would conflict with the settlement strategy of the development plan.
35 new dwellings, including 35% affordable housing with vehicular and pedestrian access via Dropping Holms, the provision of public open space, associated infrastructure and landscaping
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Parker R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would conflict with the settlement strategy of the development plan
- the extent to which the Council is unable to demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on the setting of nearby listed buildings and the setting of Henfield Conservation Area
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets, combined with harm to character and appearance and conflict with the recently made Neighbourhood Plan, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.
The combined harm to character and appearance, heritage assets and the recently made Neighbourhood Plan significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, economic activity and ecological enhancement, despite the shortfall in five year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2Policy 3Policy 4Policy 26Policy 25(1)Policy 32Policy 33Policy 34Policy 16Policy 15HNP Policy 1 (P1.2)HNP Policy 10 (P10.3 d.)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 71Paragraph 174Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Allowed12 October 20266011680Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP
- Allowed25 September 20266010268Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN
- Allowed24 September 20266007772The Lamb Inn, Lambs Green, Rusper, RH12 4RG
- Allowed10 September 20266009593Land East of Spring Gardens, Washington, RH20 3BP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®