Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 March 20223261974

Home Farm House, Hall Drive, Gosfield, HALSTEAD, CO9 1RZ

removal of greenhouse wall and construction of ancillary outbuilding and outdoor swimming pool

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Smith A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to its effects upon the settings and thereby the significance of relevant Grade I and II listed buildings and the significance of a Grade II listed Registered Park and Garden
  • In the event that the proposal would cause harm to the significance of any designated heritage asset(s), whether or not this harm would be outweighed by the proposal's public benefits

What decided it

The heritage harm to designated assets caused by the proposal's incongruous scale, mass and urbanising character was not outweighed by modest public benefits, and the proposal failed to accord with statutory duties under Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: RLP100, RLP2, RLP90, RLP103, CS5, SP7, LPP50, LPP60, LPP1, LPP38, LPP55

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.