Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 June 20213262152

76, Eastwood Road, South Woodford, London, Essex, E18 1BU

Planning appeal 3262152 at 76, Eastwood Road, South Woodford, London, Essex, E18 1BU (London Borough of Redbridge) was allowed on 14 June 2021 by Inspector Biggers P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the house in multiple occupation is in an appropriate location and compatible with the character of the surrounding area.

change of use of property from C3 (dwelling) to C4 (small HMO up to 6 people)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Biggers P
Postcode
E18 1BU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the house in multiple occupation is in an appropriate location and compatible with the character of the surrounding area
  • Whether the proposed development would have an adverse impact on the living conditions for present and future occupants of neighbouring properties in respect of noise and disturbance and parking stress

What decided it

The location's proximity to South Woodford District Centre, Underground station and bus routes, combined with the property's corner position reducing impact on neighbouring housing, meant the small HMO would be appropriate and would not cause significant adverse impacts on character or living conditions that could not be controlled by condition.

The benefits of providing HMO housing in a sustainable, accessible location outweighed any concerns about character change or amenity impact, which could be adequately managed through conditions and licensing.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP6Policy LP26Policy LP5Policy LP23

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

356 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004591
    18 Leyswood Drive, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7JE
  3. Allowed6 May 20266005192
    38 Hertford Road, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  4. Dismissed6 May 20266000914
    12 Cavendish Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EA
  5. Dismissed28 April 20266004411
    178, The Drive, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.