Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 May 20266000914

12 Cavendish Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EA

Planning appeal 6000914 at 12 Cavendish Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EA (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 6 May 2026 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the loss of a single dwelling in this location would conflict with the aims of local planning policy to create mixed and balanced communities.

Proposed change of use of the existing property from a residential dwelling (Use Class C) to a 6 bedroom 9 person HMO (Use Class Sui Generis) including the construction of a first floor rear extension and conversion of the existing loft space with rear dormer

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
IG1 3EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the loss of a single dwelling in this location would conflict with the aims of local planning policy to create mixed and balanced communities
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and living conditions of neighbouring residents, with respect to noise and general activity

What decided it

The loss of a family-sized dwelling in conflict with Policy LP6 (which requires HMO conversions to be located within defined centres) and Policy LP5 (which seeks to maintain larger family housing) outweighed the benefits of housing supply in the context of the tilted balance.

The benefits of housing supply and HMO provision for lower-income residents were outweighed by the significant harm to the supply of family housing and conflict with development plan policies aimed at creating mixed and balanced communities.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP5Policy LP6Policy LP26
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 63

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

506 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  2. Dismissed21 April 20266002749
    32 Cowley Road, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3JL
  3. Split Decision10 April 20266003172
    159 Ilford Lane, Ilford, IG1 2RR
  4. Dismissed25 March 20266001655
    10 Belgrave Road, Ilford, Essex, IG1 3AW
  5. Dismissed12 March 20266001944
    31 Douglas Road, Ilford, IG3 8UX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.