Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20213262378

259 Ivyhouse Road, Dagenham Essex, London, Essex, RM9 5RT

Planning appeal 3262378 at 259 Ivyhouse Road, Dagenham Essex, London, Essex, RM9 5RT (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 16 June 2021 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, which is a non-designated heritage asset.

first floor rear extension to accommodate bathroom

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dyer I
Postcode
RM9 5RT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, which is a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the non-designated heritage asset (Becontree Estate) outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.

The limited benefits in the form of additional accommodation and short-term support to the local building industry did not outweigh the harm to the site and area with particular regard to its historic significance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1 of The New London PlanPolicy D4 of The New London PlanPolicy CP2 of the Core StrategyPolicy CP3 of the Core StrategyPolicy BP2 of the DPPPolicy BP8 of the DPPPolicy BP11 of the DPPPolicy DM11 of the Draft Local PlanPolicy DM14 of the Draft Local PlanPolicy DM16 of the Draft Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 197

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

335 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 September 20266011342
    Land Rear Of Ship And Anchor, Wood Lane, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM8 1DR
  2. Notice varied and upheld11 June 20263347715
    Land on the South Eastern Side of Collier Row Road , Romford , Essex , RM5 2BH
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266007197
    24 Mayfair Avenue, London, RM6 6UB
  4. Allowed8 May 20266005041
    59 Mayesbrook Road, Dagenham, RM8 2EA
  5. Dismissed8 May 20266003713
    10 Bowes Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 2XJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.