Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 August 20213262529

239 Kenton Lane, HARROW, HA3 8RP

erection of a first floor extension and alterations to flat to provide additional residential accommodation

Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring property, in particular the occupiers of No. 241 Kenton Lane
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the property, particularly in respect of the provision of outdoor amenity space, outlook and provision of refuse and recycling storage
  • Whether there are any other material considerations which indicate the appeal should be determined other than in accordance with the Development Plan

What decided it

The proposal would fail to respect the character of the host building and surrounding area, would cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions through overshadowing and loss of outlook, and would provide inadequate living conditions for future occupiers due to severely reduced amenity space and poor bedroom outlook.

The contribution to diverse housing needs was outweighed by the poor standard of accommodation for future occupiers and the unacceptable detrimental effects on neighbouring living conditions.

Plan policies cited: CS1.B, DM1, DM27, DM45, D3, D6

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [1982] JPL 37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.