Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 August 20213262600

Former Loxley Works, Storrs Bridge Lane, Loxley, Sheffield, S6 6SX

Planning appeal 3262600 at Former Loxley Works, Storrs Bridge Lane, Loxley, Sheffield, S6 6SX (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 10 August 2021 by Inspector Whitehead M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the Council can demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.

a Hybrid Application for change of use of existing buildings to be retained, altered vehicular access from Loxley Road with secondary public transport access from Rowell Lane and associated works with outline approval (with all other matters reserved) for demolition of existing buildings and structures, provision of a residential led mixed-use development that will deliver up to 300 dwellings, reinstatement works, site remediation, green infrastructure, landscaping and associated infrastructure

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Whitehead M
Postcode
S6 6SX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the Council can demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply
  • whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development for the purposes of Section 13 of the Framework
  • its effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in the Green Belt
  • its effect on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • its effect on the ecology and biodiversity of the surrounding area
  • its accessibility by means other than the car
  • its effect on the risk from flooding
  • if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal's substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, as inappropriate development, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development did not exist.

the substantial harm from inappropriateness and to Green Belt openness, together with harm to character and appearance and other harm from an unsustainable location and flood risk, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, brownfield redevelopment and other considerations, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GE1Policy GE2Policy GE3Policy GE4Policy GE5Policy CS71Policy GE8Policy GE10Policy BE18Policy GE15Policy GE11Policy GE17Policy CS40policies BE2 and GE2 (Loxley Valley Design Statement)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 75Paragraph 105Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 125Paragraph 126Paragraph 128Paragraph 130Paragraph 131Paragraph 134Paragraph 145Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 164Paragraph 174Paragraph 219
Judgments
R (oao Hampshire CC v Blackbushe Airport Ltd [2021 EWCA Civ 389 )

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Split Decision23 July 20263377264
    Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
  2. Allowed21 July 20266004273
    Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
  3. Dismissed8 July 20266005492
    Station Pastures, Land Between Loicher Lane and Butterthwaite Lane, Sheffield, S35 9WA
  4. Notice upheld7 January 20263371920
    The Cottage, The Old Mayfield School , David Lane, Sheffield, S10 4PH
  5. Dismissed8 December 20253369176
    Moor Top Farm, Whitelow Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S17 3AG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.