Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20213263077

106 Newland Avenue, Kingston Upon Hull, HU5 3AA

Planning appeal 3263077 at 106 Newland Avenue, Kingston Upon Hull, HU5 3AA (Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council) was dismissed on 23 June 2021 by Inspector Seaton M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed condition restricting customer presence to 0800–2330 hours is reasonable or necessary in order to protect the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, having particular regard to noise and disturbance, and crime and disorder.

use as an adult gaming centre without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 17/01691/S73, dated 13 February 2018

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Seaton M
Postcode
HU5 3AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition restricting customer presence to 0800–2330 hours is reasonable or necessary in order to protect the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, having particular regard to noise and disturbance, and crime and disorder

What decided it

The extension of hours would not address realistic concerns over crime and disorder and would place customers at risk, contrary to NPPF paragraphs 91 and 127 and local plan policies protecting residential amenity and town centre suitability.

The limited economic benefits of extended hours would not outweigh the harm to neighbouring residential amenity and the failure to address crime and disorder concerns in the vicinity

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 12Policy 23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 91Paragraph 127

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

81 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld22 May 20263359233
    113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
  2. Notice upheld22 May 20263359093
    113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
  3. Allowed6 May 20266005071
    170-172 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1PG
  4. Dismissed6 May 20266005069
    170-172 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1PG
  5. Dismissed6 May 20266002751
    International Food Store, 170-172 Spring Bank, Kingston Upon Hull, HU3 1PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.