Planning appeal decision
Notice upheld22 May 20263359093
113 spring bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
without planning permission: the unauthorised change of use of the Premises from offices to flats
- Authority
- Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Hartley D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the enforcement notice was properly served on all persons with an interest in the land
- Whether the alleged breach of planning control has occurred
- Whether the alleged matters constitute a breach of planning control
- Whether enforcement action was time-barred
- Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach
- Whether the compliance period is reasonable
What decided it
The requirement to revert the property to offices exceeded what was necessary to remedy the breach of planning control, whereas ceasing the use as flats alone was sufficient.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®