Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 September 20213263126

519-527 Gale Street, Dagenham, RM9 4TP

alterations to existing first floor flat, incorporating a rear infill extension, and the erection of a two-storey roof extension to create 9 additional units (3 x 1 bedroom units, 4 x 2 bedroom 3 person units and 2 x 2 bedroom 4 person units)

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The height, mass, materials and visual prominence of the proposed roof extension would result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the distinctive stepped building form of the parade, which cannot be justified by the benefits of housing supply or town centre vitality.

The benefits of housing supply and town centre vitality do not justify the significant harm to character and appearance identified as the main issue.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 (Delivering Good Design) of the London Plan, Policy CP2 (Protecting and Promoting our Historic Environment) of the Barking and Dagenham Core Strategy (2010), Policy CP3 (High Quality Built Environment) of the Barking and Dagenham Core Strategy (2010), Policy BP2 (Conservation Areas and Listed Buildings) of the Barking and Dagenham Borough Wide Development Policies (2011), Policy BP11 (Urban Design) of the Barking and Dagenham Borough Wide Development Policies (2011), Policy HC1 (Heritage and conservation growth) of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.