Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20213263489

Site of 22 and 24 Southend Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4QH

demolition of two existing properties and the erection of 7no. 2 bed flats with associated works

Authority
Rochford District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Osgathorp C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area
  • Whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for on-site parking
  • Whether the proposed development would provide an acceptable living environment for future occupiers of the second floor flat, with particular regard to internal space standards

What decided it

The identified adverse effects of the proposal—significant harm to character and appearance, inadequate parking provision causing neighbour disturbance, and failure to provide acceptable living conditions—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.

The moderate benefits of providing 5 additional dwellings and supporting local services were significantly outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the significant harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, even under the tilted balance triggered by lack of five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 8, 11, 60, 69, 124, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM3, Policy DM4, Policy DM30, Policy CP1, Policy H1

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE (1982)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.