Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20213263489

Site of 22 and 24 Southend Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4QH

Planning appeal 3263489 at Site of 22 and 24 Southend Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4QH (Rochford District Council) was dismissed on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Osgathorp C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area.

demolition of two existing properties and the erection of 7no. 2 bed flats with associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Osgathorp C
Postcode
SS5 4QH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area
  • Whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for on-site parking
  • Whether the proposed development would provide an acceptable living environment for future occupiers of the second floor flat, with particular regard to internal space standards

What decided it

The identified adverse effects of the proposal—significant harm to character and appearance, inadequate parking provision causing neighbour disturbance, and failure to provide acceptable living conditions—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.

The moderate benefits of providing 5 additional dwellings and supporting local services were significantly outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the significant harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, even under the tilted balance triggered by lack of five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy DM3Policy DM4Policy DM30Policy CP1Policy H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 124Paragraph 130
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE (1982)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

75 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 August 20266008013
    5 Marshalls, Rochford, SS4 1SP
  2. Dismissed10 August 20266004687
    33-35 Castle Road, Rayleigh, SS6 7QD
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266003620
    4 & 6 Love Lane, Rayleigh, SS6 7DL
  4. Allowed9 July 20266004863
    9 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
  5. Allowed23 October 20253364836
    Land Rear of 17 Hillside Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4RT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.