Planning appeal decision
Site of 22 and 24 Southend Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4QH
Planning appeal 3263489 at Site of 22 and 24 Southend Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4QH (Rochford District Council) was dismissed on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Osgathorp C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area.
demolition of two existing properties and the erection of 7no. 2 bed flats with associated works
- Authority
- Rochford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Osgathorp C
- Postcode
- SS5 4QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area
- Whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for on-site parking
- Whether the proposed development would provide an acceptable living environment for future occupiers of the second floor flat, with particular regard to internal space standards
What decided it
The identified adverse effects of the proposal—significant harm to character and appearance, inadequate parking provision causing neighbour disturbance, and failure to provide acceptable living conditions—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.
The moderate benefits of providing 5 additional dwellings and supporting local services were significantly outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the significant harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, even under the tilted balance triggered by lack of five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy DM3Policy DM4Policy DM30Policy CP1Policy H1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 124Paragraph 130
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE (1982)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rochford
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed27 August 202660080135 Marshalls, Rochford, SS4 1SP
- Dismissed10 August 2026600468733-35 Castle Road, Rayleigh, SS6 7QD
- Dismissed7 August 202660036204 & 6 Love Lane, Rayleigh, SS6 7DL
- Allowed9 July 202660048639 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
- Allowed23 October 20253364836Land Rear of 17 Hillside Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4RT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®