Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20213263501

35 Lower Road, Harrow, HA2 0DE

Planning appeal 3263501 at 35 Lower Road, Harrow, HA2 0DE (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 3 June 2021 by Inspector Johnson W, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the appeal site and the Roxeth Hill Conservation Area.

side gable, rear dormer and front Velux with loft conversion

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Johnson W
Postcode
HA2 0DE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the appeal site and the Roxeth Hill Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed hip-to-gable conversion would cause less-than-substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Roxeth Hill Conservation Area that would not be outweighed by the private benefit of additional accommodation, and would fail to comply with the statutory duty under section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

the private benefit of additional accommodation was outweighed by the less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the Roxeth Hill Conservation Area and the statutory duty to preserve or enhance its character and appearance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy HC1.CHarrow Core Strategy 2012 Policy CS1Harrow Development Management Policies 2013 Policy DM1Harrow Development Management Policies 2013 Policy DM7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 192Paragraph 196

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

387 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.