Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20213264943

Flat 4, 50 Holland Park, London, W11 3RS

erection of single storey rear extension to second floor terrace; installation of new French doors giving access to terrace; and addition of roof lantern

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Cullen F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed building, 50 Holland Park
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Holland Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would weaken the vertical architectural hierarchy of the rear elevation and contribute to piecemeal erosion of the building's heritage interests through an unusual elevated addition at second floor level, contrary to the established pattern in the conservation area, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh the less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets.

The less than substantial harm to the special interest and significance of the Grade II listed building and the Holland Park Conservation Area outweighed the minimal public benefits of the proposal, which were principally of private benefit to the occupiers.

Framework references: 197, 199, 200, 201, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL4, Policy CL6, Policy CL9, Policy CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.