Planning appeal decision
Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
Planning appeal 3376699 at Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 2 June 2026 by Inspector Heron E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including Sloane/Stanley Conservation Area.
The proposed removal of an existing telephone kiosk, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit
- Appeal type
- commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Heron E
- Postcode
- SW10 0LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including Sloane/Stanley Conservation Area
- Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on the amenity of the area
What decided it
The harmfully discordant appearance of the digital illuminated displays within the street scene and their visibility within views of the historic Conservation Area, combined with the modest public benefits, could not justify the less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset.
the modest public benefits of modern communications infrastructure and free services did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, to which considerable importance and weight was given
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CD1Policy CD2Policy CD3Policy CD4Policy CD15Policy TR4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 215Paragraph 119Paragraph 141
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed18 November 20253373604Advertising Right On Flank Wall of 318A Ladbroke Grove, London, W10 5NQ
- Dismissed12 November 20253364049Ground Floor, 246 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NA
- Allowed16 April 2025335782280 Tavistock Rd, London, W11 1AN
- Dismissed23 December 20243352568100 Kensington High Street, London, W8 4SG
- Dismissed10 July 2024334056013 Thurloe Street, London, SW7 2SS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®