Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 June 20263376699

Kings Road, outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR

The proposed removal of an existing telephone kiosk, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Heron E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including Sloane/Stanley Conservation Area
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on the amenity of the area

What decided it

The harmfully discordant appearance of the digital illuminated displays within the street scene and their visibility within views of the historic Conservation Area, combined with the modest public benefits, could not justify the less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset.

the modest public benefits of modern communications infrastructure and free services did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, to which considerable importance and weight was given

Framework references: 215, 119, 141

Plan policies cited: Policy CD1, Policy CD2, Policy CD3, Policy CD4, Policy CD15, Policy TR4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.