Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20223265828

92 and 94 Potters Lane, Send, Woking, GU23 7AL

Planning appeal 3265828 at 92 and 94 Potters Lane, Send, Woking, GU23 7AL (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 January 2022 by Inspector Pipkin R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of the corridor of the River Wey.

demolition of 2 dwellings (92 and 94 Potters Lane) and the erection of 29 dwellings (12 affordable) including access, associated garages, parking, open space, play area and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Pipkin R
Postcode
GU23 7AL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of the corridor of the River Wey
  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the setting of the Wey and Godalming Navigations Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook and overbearing effect on Numbers 96 and 108 Potters Lane, and noise and disturbance on Number 90 Potters Lane
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants of Plots 21-29, with regard to the overbearing impact from adjacent development, noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (TBHSPA)
  • whether the proposal would secure required contributions to affordable housing and infrastructure provision

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, the setting of the WGNCA, living conditions and highway safety was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme, which carried only moderate weight.

the moderate weight given to the public benefits (affordable housing, economic and environmental benefits) did not outweigh the great weight attached to the less than substantial harm to the WGNCA and the other harms identified, so the balance tipped against the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D1Saved Policy G5Saved Policy G11Policy Send 1Policy Send 4Policy G1(3)Policy ID3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Notice upheld30 September 20263366379
    86 Haydon Place, Guildford, GU1 4LR
  4. Allowed5 August 20266005082
    Land Adjacent to, 17 Little Platt, Guildford, GU2 8JU
  5. Dismissed9 July 20266007507
    183, Applegarth Avenue, Guildford, GU2 8LP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.