Planning appeal decision
92 and 94 Potters Lane, Send, Woking, GU23 7AL
Planning appeal 3265828 at 92 and 94 Potters Lane, Send, Woking, GU23 7AL (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 January 2022 by Inspector Pipkin R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of the corridor of the River Wey.
demolition of 2 dwellings (92 and 94 Potters Lane) and the erection of 29 dwellings (12 affordable) including access, associated garages, parking, open space, play area and landscaping
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- GU23 7AL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of the corridor of the River Wey
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the setting of the Wey and Godalming Navigations Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook and overbearing effect on Numbers 96 and 108 Potters Lane, and noise and disturbance on Number 90 Potters Lane
- whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants of Plots 21-29, with regard to the overbearing impact from adjacent development, noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (TBHSPA)
- whether the proposal would secure required contributions to affordable housing and infrastructure provision
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, the setting of the WGNCA, living conditions and highway safety was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme, which carried only moderate weight.
the moderate weight given to the public benefits (affordable housing, economic and environmental benefits) did not outweigh the great weight attached to the less than substantial harm to the WGNCA and the other harms identified, so the balance tipped against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D3Policy D1Saved Policy G5Saved Policy G11Policy Send 1Policy Send 4Policy G1(3)Policy ID3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Notice upheld30 September 2026336637986 Haydon Place, Guildford, GU1 4LR
- Allowed5 August 20266005082Land Adjacent to, 17 Little Platt, Guildford, GU2 8JU
- Dismissed9 July 20266007507183, Applegarth Avenue, Guildford, GU2 8LP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®