Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20223265828

92 and 94 Potters Lane, Send, WOKING, GU23 7AL

demolition of 2 dwellings (92 and 94 Potters Lane) and the erection of 29 dwellings (12 affordable) including access, associated garages, parking, open space, play area and landscaping

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of the corridor of the River Wey
  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the setting of the Wey and Godalming Navigations Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook and overbearing effect on Numbers 96 and 108 Potters Lane, and noise and disturbance on Number 90 Potters Lane
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants of Plots 21-29, with regard to the overbearing impact from adjacent development, noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (TBHSPA)
  • whether the proposal would secure required contributions to affordable housing and infrastructure provision

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, the setting of the WGNCA, living conditions and highway safety was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme, which carried only moderate weight.

the moderate weight given to the public benefits (affordable housing, economic and environmental benefits) did not outweigh the great weight attached to the less than substantial harm to the WGNCA and the other harms identified, so the balance tipped against the proposal

Framework references: 11, 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D1, Saved Policy G5, Saved Policy G11, Policy Send 1, Policy Send 4, Policy G1(3), Policy ID3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.