Planning appeal decision
Land at Bethwines Farm and South of Ivy Lodge, West of Blackboy Lane, Fishbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8BH
Planning appeal 3266072 at Land at Bethwines Farm and South of Ivy Lodge, West of Blackboy Lane, Fishbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8BH (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 4 October 2021 by Inspector Jackson R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the area.
construction of 35 no. affordable residential dwellings for first-time buyers with associated access, parking, landscaping and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jackson R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on the living conditions of the proposed occupiers, in terms of outdoor amenity space, privacy and noise
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision for foul and surface water disposal
- whether the proposal would utilise sustainable construction methods in line with development plan policy
- the effect on habitats sites
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing and necessary infrastructure
- whether there are any other material considerations, including the nature of the proposals and its benefits, the housing land supply position and the current status of the development plan, that mean the proposal should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the terms of the development plan
What decided it
The Inspector could not conclude, absent an appropriate assessment, that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of habitats sites, which precluded the tilted balance and, combined with other harms, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole.
The harms from poor design, inadequate drainage, unresolved nitrate neutrality/habitats effects, unsecured affordable housing and infrastructure outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and the lack of a five-year housing land supply, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2Policy 33Policy 45Policy 48Policy 54Policy 40Policy 50Policy 8Policy 9Policy 35Policy 12Policy D 1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 72Paragraph 78Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 134Paragraph 167Paragraph 174Paragraph 182
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed5 August 20263371769Melita Nursery, Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, PO20 7LW
- Dismissed6 July 20266003763Unit 1 The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003762The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003760Land South of Unit 1, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003759The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®