Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20213266268

Kittsmead, Colestock Road, Cowden, Edenbridge, TN8 7EB

Planning appeal 3266268 at Kittsmead, Colestock Road, Cowden, Edenbridge, TN8 7EB (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 18 June 2021 by Inspector Small M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for housing, having regard to local and national policies and the accessibility of facilities and services.

part demolition/part retention of buildings on site with an extension to create a new dwelling on site

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Small M
Postcode
TN8 7EB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is an appropriate location for housing, having regard to local and national policies and the accessibility of facilities and services
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to its location within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

What decided it

The site's isolated location outside any development boundary, combined with poor accessibility to facilities and services necessitating reliance on private car travel, means the proposals conflict with the development plan and Framework policies on sustainable development, and the modest housing benefit does not outweigh these adverse impacts.

The conflict with the development plan attracted only moderate weight due to the Council's significant shortfall in five-year housing land supply (3.28 years), but the modest housing benefit, limited economic and biodiversity benefits, and significant adverse impacts of locating development in an unsustainable, isolated location contrary to Framework policies on sustainable transport and rural housing vitality meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy WCS6Saved Policy GD2Saved Policy DC17Spatial Planning Objective SPO7Saved Policy EN1Policy WCS14Spatial Planning Objective SPO8Saved Policy EN6Spatial Planning Objective SPO1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 172Paragraph 79Paragraph 77Paragraph 78Paragraph 118Paragraph 11
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin); [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHCLG & Others [2021] EWCA Civ 320

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wealden District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011286
    37 High Street, Frant, TN3 9DT
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266010554
    Ivy House, Mayfield Road, Mark Cross, Rotherfield, TN6 3PJ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266011082
    Willow Farm, Under Road, Herstmonceux, BN27 1QE
  4. Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589
    Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266009517
    Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.