Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 April 20223266924

Norman, Land New Cherry Orchard Gardens, West Molesey, Surrey , KT8 1QY

Planning appeal 3266924 at Norman, Land New Cherry Orchard Gardens, West Molesey, Surrey , KT8 1QY (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 April 2022 by Inspector Allen R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

retrospective application for the mooring of a pleasure craft

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Allen R
Postcode
KT8 1QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposals amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effects on openness and any other harm
  • the other considerations
  • whether 'very special circumstances' exist to outweigh the harm from inappropriateness, openness and any other harm

What decided it

Whether 'very special circumstances', in particular the welfare of a dependent child in Appeal E, existed to clearly outweigh the significant harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, loss of openness and other harm.

For Appeals A-D the harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness, flood risk, ecology and character/appearance was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including modest housing/affordable housing benefits; for Appeal E the welfare of the child was found sufficient to outweigh the significant Green Belt harm, justifying a temporary rather than permanent permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM17Policy DM13Policy DM2Policy DM20Policy DM22Policy DM5Policy DM21Policy CS26Policy CS12Policy CS15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 57
Judgments
Alison Hook vs Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Surrey Heath Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 486

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

231 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266004985
    4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ
  2. Dismissed16 July 20266007665
    Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
  3. Dismissed29 June 20266007101
    The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
  4. Dismissed4 June 20266006584
    Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
  5. Dismissed9 March 20263356517
    Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.