Planning appeal decision
NORMAN, LAND NEW CHERRY ORCHARD GARDENS, WEST MOLESEY, SURREY , KT8 1QY
retrospective application for the mooring of a pleasure craft
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Allen R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposals amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effects on openness and any other harm
- the other considerations
- whether 'very special circumstances' exist to outweigh the harm from inappropriateness, openness and any other harm
What decided it
Whether 'very special circumstances', in particular the welfare of a dependent child in Appeal E, existed to clearly outweigh the significant harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, loss of openness and other harm.
For Appeals A-D the harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness, flood risk, ecology and character/appearance was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including modest housing/affordable housing benefits; for Appeal E the welfare of the child was found sufficient to outweigh the significant Green Belt harm, justifying a temporary rather than permanent permission.
Framework references: 11, 137, 147, 148, 149, 150, 57
Plan policies cited: Policy DM17, Policy DM13, Policy DM2, Policy DM20, Policy DM22, Policy DM5, Policy DM21, Policy CS26, Policy CS12, Policy CS15
Judgments cited: Alison Hook vs Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Surrey Heath Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 486
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®