Planning appeal decision
4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ
Planning appeal 6004985 at 4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 August 2026 by Inspector A M Nilsson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
proposed single storey rear extension to accommodate another bedroom
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- A M Nilsson
- Postcode
- TW17 8NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on flood risk
- The effect of the proposed development on ecology
- If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The cumulative effect of the proposed extension and previous extensions would result in a disproportionate addition of approximately 145% in footprint over the original building, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and minor harm to openness, together with flood risk harm, were not clearly outweighed by the limited private benefit to the appellant, resulting in no very special circumstances to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM18Policy CS26Policy CS15Policy DM21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 153
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed16 July 20266007665Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
- Dismissed29 June 20266007101The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
- Dismissed4 June 20266006584Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
- Dismissed9 March 20263356517Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF
- Dismissed3 March 20263376048Lian Yard, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®