Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 August 20266004985

4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ

Planning appeal 6004985 at 4, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 August 2026 by Inspector A M Nilsson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

proposed single storey rear extension to accommodate another bedroom

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
A M Nilsson
Postcode
TW17 8NJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on flood risk
  • The effect of the proposed development on ecology
  • If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed extension and previous extensions would result in a disproportionate addition of approximately 145% in footprint over the original building, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and minor harm to openness, together with flood risk harm, were not clearly outweighed by the limited private benefit to the appellant, resulting in no very special circumstances to justify the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM18Policy CS26Policy CS15Policy DM21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 153

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

184 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed16 July 20266007665
    Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
  2. Dismissed29 June 20266007101
    The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
  3. Dismissed4 June 20266006584
    Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
  4. Dismissed9 March 20263356517
    Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF
  5. Dismissed3 March 20263376048
    Lian Yard, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.