Planning appeal decision
Land at Borstal TA Base, Borstal Road, Rochester, ME1 3BG
Planning appeal 3267052 at Land at Borstal TA Base, Borstal Road, Rochester, ME1 3BG (Medway Council) was dismissed on 4 November 2021 by Inspector Reed D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on Fort Clarence, a scheduled ancient monument and Grade II listed building, No 85 St Margaret's Street, a Grade II listed building, and the Watts Avenue and Roebuck Road Conservation Area, in each case as a result of its location within their setting.
the installation of a 15 metre monopole, accommodating 6 no. antennas, the installation of 2 no. microwave dishes, the installation of 2 no. equipment cabinets, along with ancillary works; also removal of 3 no. antennas (top of antennas 12 metres above ground level) and 3 no. ground-based equipment cabinets
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Reed D
- Postcode
- ME1 3BG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on Fort Clarence, a scheduled ancient monument and Grade II listed building, No 85 St Margaret's Street, a Grade II listed building, and the Watts Avenue and Roebuck Road Conservation Area, in each case as a result of its location within their setting
What decided it
The significant harm to Fort Clarence's significance as a scheduled ancient monument and listed building through visual intrusion and undermining of its landmark status, which was not outweighed by the public benefits of improved communications given the potential for more suitable alternative sites.
The strong policy support for advanced communications and the technical requirements for the installation were recognised, but the less than substantial harm to heritage assets was not outweighed by the public benefits given the potential for more suitable alternative sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BNE18Policy BNE12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 194Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 117Paragraph 118Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Medway
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed26 September 20253355647Land Adjacent To Lower Bloors Lane , Rainham, Gillingham, Medway, Kent, ME8 7TR
- Allowed24 January 20253347584Land at Grassed Verge , Borstal Road (Opposite Entrance to Army Reserve Centre), Rochester, ME1 3BD
- Allowed15 January 2025334137118 City Way, Rochester, ME1 2AB
- Dismissed24 July 20233307648Land South of Bush Road, Near Cuxton, Medway, Kent, ME2 1HQ
- Allowed22 May 20233288041Brompton Road, Medway,, ME7 5QT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®