Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent To Lower Bloors Lane , Rainham, Gillingham, Medway, Kent, ME8 7TR
outline application for the erection of up to 21no. dwellings with all matters reserved except for access
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Bayliss G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the appeal site would be a suitable location for residential development having regard to the development plan strategy for the area and access to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area
- The effect of the proposal on nearby heritage assets
- The effect of the proposal on the ecology of the site
- The effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety
What decided it
The harm to designated heritage assets, particularly the Grade II* listed Bloors Place, to which great weight must be given under the Framework, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of housing delivery, and this provided a strong reason for refusing the development that disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The moderate weight attributed to public benefits including 21 dwellings and affordable housing was insufficient to outweigh the great weight given to the conservation of designated heritage assets, and the cumulative harm to character, appearance, landscape and ecology meant the scheme would not accord with the development plan as a whole.
Framework references: 11, 83, 84, 110, 115, 117, 202, 212, 213
Plan policies cited: Policy BNE25, Policy BNE34, Policy BNE12, Policy BNE18, Policy BNE37, Policy T1, Policy T2, Policy T13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®