Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent To Lower Bloors Lane , Rainham, Gillingham, Medway, Kent, ME8 7TR
Planning appeal 3355647 at Land Adjacent To Lower Bloors Lane , Rainham, Gillingham, Medway, Kent, ME8 7TR (Medway Council) was dismissed on 26 September 2025 by Inspector Bayliss G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the appeal site would be a suitable location for residential development having regard to the development plan strategy for the area and access to services and facilities.
outline application for the erection of up to 21no. dwellings with all matters reserved except for access
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Bayliss G
- Postcode
- ME8 7TR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the appeal site would be a suitable location for residential development having regard to the development plan strategy for the area and access to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area
- The effect of the proposal on nearby heritage assets
- The effect of the proposal on the ecology of the site
- The effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety
What decided it
The harm to designated heritage assets, particularly the Grade II* listed Bloors Place, to which great weight must be given under the Framework, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of housing delivery, and this provided a strong reason for refusing the development that disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The moderate weight attributed to public benefits including 21 dwellings and affordable housing was insufficient to outweigh the great weight given to the conservation of designated heritage assets, and the cumulative harm to character, appearance, landscape and ecology meant the scheme would not accord with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BNE25Policy BNE34Policy BNE12Policy BNE18Policy BNE37Policy T1Policy T2Policy T13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 202Paragraph 212Paragraph 213
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Medway
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 January 2025334137118 City Way, Rochester, ME1 2AB
- Dismissed24 July 20233307648Land South of Bush Road, Near Cuxton, Medway, Kent, ME2 1HQ
- Allowed22 May 20233288041Brompton Road, Medway,, ME7 5QT
- Allowed7 February 20223280915Land at East Hill, Chatham, Kent, ME7 3JL
- Dismissed4 November 20213267052Land at Borstal TA Base, Borstal Road, Rochester, ME1 3BG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®