Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20213267806

65A Pendas Way, Leeds, LS15 8HU

Planning appeal 3267806 at 65A Pendas Way, Leeds, LS15 8HU (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 1 November 2021 by Inspector Dowsett J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

Erection of one detached dwelling house with associated car parking and amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dowsett J
Postcode
LS15 8HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of numbers 37 and 39 Pendas Walk, with particular regard to outlook and daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The significant and enduring harm to character and appearance combined with adverse effects on biodiversity outweighed the provision of a single new dwelling, particularly as the development plan policies were not out of date and the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing supply.

The Framework's objective to significantly boost housing supply does not justify the significant and enduring harm to character and appearance and reduction in biodiversity value caused by a single dwelling, where the development plan is up to date and housing land supply is demonstrable.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H2Policy P10Policy G9Policy P12Saved Policy GP5Saved Policy BD5Saved Policy LD1Policy LAND 2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

50 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.