Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20213267806

65A Pendas Way, Leeds, LS15 8HU

Erection of one detached dwelling house with associated car parking and amenity space

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dowsett J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of numbers 37 and 39 Pendas Walk, with particular regard to outlook and daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The significant and enduring harm to character and appearance combined with adverse effects on biodiversity outweighed the provision of a single new dwelling, particularly as the development plan policies were not out of date and the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing supply.

The Framework's objective to significantly boost housing supply does not justify the significant and enduring harm to character and appearance and reduction in biodiversity value caused by a single dwelling, where the development plan is up to date and housing land supply is demonstrable.

Plan policies cited: Policy H2, Policy P10, Policy G9, Policy P12, Saved Policy GP5, Saved Policy BD5, Saved Policy LD1, Policy LAND 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.