Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 August 20213267947

Dog Inn, Henley Road, Mappleborough Green, B80 7DR

Planning appeal 3267947 at Dog Inn, Henley Road, Mappleborough Green, B80 7DR (Stratford-on-Avon District Council) was dismissed on 25 August 2021 by Inspector Page L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Erection of a 1 x 4 metre high column with automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) camera and associated cabinet

Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Page L
Postcode
B80 7DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the Green Belt's openness and the area's character and appearance
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify development

What decided it

The development comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no demonstrated very special circumstances to justify it, as the private benefits to the Dog Inn are not clearly outweighed by other considerations and do not constitute local transport infrastructure.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by the limited and unsubstantiated private benefits claimed for the Dog Inn's operation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS10Policy CS.9Policy CS.12Policy AS.10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
Judgments
R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Broxbourne BC [2015] EWHC 185 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stratford-on-Avon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013252
    Land at Oaktree Close, Bearley, CV37 0SD
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266011546
    Chatsworth House, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5DP
  3. Allowed13 July 20266003218
    Westview, Springbrook Lane, Earlswood, B94 5SG
  4. Allowed6 July 20266008094
    Fayre Oaks, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5HX
  5. Dismissed5 June 20266004033
    Bears Cottage, Gorcott Hill, Redditch, B98 9EN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.