Planning appeal decision
32 Wrayfield Road, Cheam, SM3 9TH
Planning appeal 3268025 at 32 Wrayfield Road, Cheam, SM3 9TH (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 27 August 2021 by Inspector Thomas R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be permitted under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
Single storey rear extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Sutton
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Thomas R
- Postcode
- SM3 9TH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be permitted under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)
What decided it
The proposed extension would extend beyond the side wall of the original dwellinghouse and would have a greater width than half the width of the original dwellinghouse, which is prohibited under the GPDO 2015.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Sutton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed19 October 20266002198103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
- Allowed15 October 20266009820Grass Verge of Sparrow Farm Road, London, KT17 2DF
- Dismissed27 August 2026600526985 Priory Road, North Cheam, SM3 8LY
- Dismissed7 August 202660081243 Carshalton Grove, Sutton, SM1 4LY
- Dismissed27 July 20266006764136 Grove Road, Sutton, Sutton, SM1 2DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®