®Planning appeal decision
22 Senrab Street, LONDON, E1 0QE
remodelling of rear roof areas to create 2 No additional bedrooms and new rooflights to front roof area
- Authority
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Rafferty C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Albert Gardens Conservation Area
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Albert Gardens Conservation Area, when weighed against the limited public benefits of the proposal, was not justified under paragraph 202 of the NPPF.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was weighed against the limited public benefits of increased accommodation and sustainability features, with the harm outweighing the benefits.
Framework references: 202
Plan policies cited: Policy S.DH1, Policy S.DH3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.