Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20213268413

Land at Eccleston Close, Station Road, Backworth, NE27 0RX

construction of 67 residential dwellings (C3) and 14 No B1, B2 and B8 commercial units totalling 650sqm, with associated road infrastructure, car parking spaces, open spaces, gardens and landscaping

Authority
North Tyneside Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Dillon C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the appeal proposal would prejudice the undertaking of existing neighbouring business operations, with particular regard to the living conditions of occupants of the proposed dwellings in terms of noise levels
  • the effect of the appeal proposal on biodiversity interests, with particular regard to the existing Local Wildlife Site and protected species

What decided it

The considerable and unmitigated noise harm to the living conditions of future residents, and consequent prejudice to the neighbouring business operation, outweighed the identified benefits of the scheme.

the benefits of biodiversity net gain, economic benefits, 5-year housing land supply contribution, affordable housing and housing mix did not outweigh the significant adverse effects on living conditions and conflict with the development plan as a whole

Framework references: 185, 187, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy S4.3, Policy S1.4, Policy DM5.19, Policy S5.4, Policy DM5.5, Policy DM5.7

Judgments cited: Stoke Poges Parish Council v SSCLG and Secretary of State for Education, South Buckinghamshire DC and Slough Sikh Education Trust Ltd [2016] EWHC 1772 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.