Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 August 20213268423

77 Broom Avenue, Rotherham, S60 3NG

Planning appeal 3268423 at 77 Broom Avenue, Rotherham, S60 3NG (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 17 August 2021 by Inspector Housden S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, having particular regard to the effect on the Broom Avenue street scene.

two storey side and single storey front and rear extensions’ without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Reference RB2018/1277 dated 8 October 2018

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Housden S
Postcode
S60 3NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, having particular regard to the effect on the Broom Avenue street scene

What decided it

The specific circumstances of the appeal site, including the hipped roof form, matching materials, well-executed detailing, and the context of other extended dwellings on the street, justified a decision departing from the SPD guidance and allowing the appeal.

The departure from the recently adopted SPD guidance on wall set back and roof height was outweighed by the sympathetic design, material matching, and the absence of material harm to the character of the street scene when considered in context.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS28 of the Rotherham Local Plan Core Strategy (2014)Policy SP55 of the Rotherham Local Plan Sites and Policies document (2018)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 218

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

47 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266012644
    56 Knollbeck Lane, Brampton Bierlow, Rotherham, S73 0TP
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266013576
    Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX
  4. Allowed13 October 20266008695
    Land at Harley Road, Harley, Rotherham, S62 7UD
  5. Dismissed7 September 20266011039
    23A Rowms Lane, Swinton, S64 8AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.