Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20223268811

38 Hazeldene Gardens, Uxbridge, UB10 9DJ

Planning appeal 3268811 at 38 Hazeldene Gardens, Uxbridge, UB10 9DJ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 11 March 2022 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area.

the demolition of existing garage and construction of a 2 storey 2 bedroom home

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Law T
Postcode
UB10 9DJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 38 Hazeldene Gardens, with regard to outlook and natural light
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significant adverse impact on the living conditions of the neighbouring property at No 38, particularly regarding daylight and outlook, which demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Local Plan Part 1 Policy BE1Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMHB 11Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMHD 1Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMT2Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMT6Local Plan Part 2 Appendix CLondon Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D5London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 111

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

290 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  2. Dismissed23 July 20266004329
    14 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB
  3. Dismissed16 July 20266005866
    11 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266007587
    79 Fairholme Crescent, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8QU
  5. Dismissed12 June 20266002695
    96 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.